CSP Day 16 · Energy & Accident Causation

本课目标 | Learning objectives

5 题至少答对 4 题，并说清每题依据
把错题归为「词不懂 / 问句读错 / 依据不足」三类之一
说出本块学到的三条可迁移结论

Get at least 4 of 5 right and justify each

Sort each miss into wording, question stem, or evidence

State three transferable takeaways from this block

上传个人图片（可选）/ Add a photo (optional)

图片经过压缩后保存在当前浏览器。导出失败时，可在下方预览图片上长按保存。/ The photo is compressed and stored in this browser. If download fails, long-press the preview below to save it.

五题复盘 | Five-question recap

选出答案并提交，查看解析与依据。/ Pick an answer, submit, and read the rationale.

1. 事故因果链从表到里的顺序是？

Order of the causal chain from surface to depth?

A. 根本→间接→直接 Root -> indirect -> direct B. 直接（能量接触）→间接（管理缺陷）→根本（系统因素） Direct (energy contact) -> indirect (management deficiencies) -> root (system factors) C. 行为→设备→环境 Behavior -> equipment -> environment D. 未遂→轻伤→重伤 Near miss -> minor -> major injury

2. 下列哪一组全部属于十大危险能量源？

Which set is entirely within the ten hazardous energy types?

A. 重力、电气、疲劳 Gravity, electrical, fatigue B. 噪声、辐射、薪资 Noise, radiation, pay C. 气动、液压、生物 Pneumatic, hydraulic, biological D. 化学、噪声、态度 Chemical, noise, attitude

3. 海因里希 1:29:300 提醒管理者的核心是？

The core managerial message of 1:29:300 is:

A. 事故率可以用公式预测 Injury rates can be predicted by formula B. 未遂事件是值得管理的预警信号 Near misses are early warnings worth managing C. 轻伤可以忽略 Minor injuries can be ignored D. 重伤总是孤立的 Major injuries are always isolated events

4. 「三道屏障共用同一路控制电源」违反的概念是？

Three barriers sharing one control power supply violate:

A. ALARP B. 纵深防御的独立性 Independence in defense-in-depth C. 风险接受程序 Risk acceptance procedure D. 海因里希比例 Heinrich ratio

5. 调查报告写「工人未佩戴护目镜」作为唯一结论，最可能遗漏的是？

A report whose only conclusion is 'goggles not worn' most likely missed:

A. 直接原因A. Direct cause B. 间接与根本原因（为何暴露在能量前、为何无工程防护）B. Indirect and root causes (why the person was exposed to the energy, why there was no engineering safeguard) C. 伤害部位描述C. Description of the injury site D. 事故时间D. Time of the incident

错因归类 | Sort your misses

层次混淆：把直接原因写进根本原因 → 每个案例先画「直接/间接/根本」三层再下笔Mixing levels: putting direct causes in the root cause → For every case, draw the direct/indirect/root layers before writing
能量清单不全：只盯电气机械 → 用十大能量源逐类扫现场Incomplete energy list: watching only electrical and mechanical → Sweep the site category by category with the ten energy sources
比例误用：把 1:29:300 当预测公式 → 只用它的「预警」含义Misusing the ratio: treating 1:29:300 as a predictive formula → Use only its "warning" meaning

接下来学什么：下一块（Day 17–21）把屏障思维变成打分工具：风险矩阵与控制层级的实操。你会学到先估严重度再估可能性、固有风险与剩余风险、以及为什么考试里 PPE 几乎不是最佳答案。
Next block (Day 17–21) turns barriers into scoring tools: the risk matrix and hierarchy in practice — severity before likelihood, inherent vs residual risk, and why PPE is almost never the exam's best answer.

学习打卡与笔记 | Progress & notes

完成 BCSP 官方自测并记录结果 / Complete the BCSP self-assessment 建立公式表与英文术语表 / Create the formula sheet and glossary 完成情景题与两道巩固题 / Complete the scenario and both review prompts 通读蓝图 PDF 的领域与权重 / Read the blueprint domains and weights

已完成 0/4 项 / 0/4 tasks complete

连续学习 / Learning streak: 0 天 / 0 days

进度保存在当前浏览器，不会自动跨设备同步。/ Progress is stored in this browser only.

PNG 学习记录预览；可长按图片保存 / PNG card preview; long-press to save

可靠来源 | Official references

BCSP — CSP Examination Blueprint (CSP11)

BCSP — Official Self-Assessments

BCSP — Certified Safety Professional (CSP)

Pearson VUE — CSP 考试预约 / Scheduling

本课为一般性学习资料，不替代现场专业评估、法规要求或组织程序。/ Educational content only.

← 返回课程目录 / Back to catalog