本课只做一件事:用 5 道题检验「PHA 与 HAZOP」,并把错的那几道归到具体原因上。
Test PHA & HAZOP with five items and trace every miss to a specific cause.
本课不涉及:不出新知识点——只检验前四课学过的内容。
Not covered here: No new material — only what lessons 1 to 4 covered.
本课目标 | Learning objectives
- 5 题至少答对 4 题,并说清每题依据
- 把错题归为「词不懂 / 问句读错 / 依据不足」三类之一
- 说出本块学到的三条可迁移结论
图片经过压缩后保存在当前浏览器。导出失败时,可在下方预览图片上长按保存。/ The photo is compressed and stored in this browser. If download fails, long-press the preview below to save it.
五题复盘 | Five-question recap
选出答案并提交,查看解析与依据。/ Pick an answer, submit, and read the rationale.
1. HAZOP 的偏差由什么组合而成?
HAZOP deviations are formed by?
2. 节点划分的判据是?
Nodes are split by?
3. 五栏表的五栏是?
The five columns are?
4. 合格保护措施的两个必要条件?
Two necessary conditions for a safeguard?
5. PSM 场景的 PHA 再验证周期通常是?
PHA revalidation under PSM usually runs?
错因归类 | Sort your misses
- 把偏差当后果 → 「无流量」写成后果,保护措施全部对错位Treating a deviation as a consequence → Writing "no flow" as the consequence puts every safeguard out of alignment
- 把报警当独立保护 → 与原因共因,控制失灵时同时失效Treating an alarm as an independent protection → It shares a common cause with the initiating event and fails with the control
- 只写建议不写责任人与日期 → 闭环率永远为零,study 白做Writing recommendations without owners and dates → Closure rate stays at zero and the study is wasted
接下来学什么:下一块(Day 172–176)继续 Domain 3:风险评价矩阵与 ALARP——严重度×可能性怎么定、ALARP 怎么论证、可接受与可容忍的界线。
Next block (Days 172–176), still Domain 3: risk matrices and ALARP — setting severity and likelihood, arguing ALARP, and the line between acceptable and tolerable.
学习打卡与笔记 | Progress & notes
已完成 0/4 项 / 0/4 tasks complete
进度保存在当前浏览器,不会自动跨设备同步。/ Progress is stored in this browser only.
可靠来源 | Official references
BCSP — CSP Examination Blueprint (CSP11)
BCSP — Official Self-Assessments
BCSP — Certified Safety Professional (CSP)
Pearson VUE — CSP 考试预约 / Scheduling
本课为一般性学习资料,不替代现场专业评估、法规要求或组织程序。/ Educational content only.
← 返回课程目录 / Back to catalog
来自 昏昏睡睡HSE · From Drowsy HSE
CSP DAILY LEARNING · DAY 171