来自 昏昏睡睡HSE · From Drowsy HSE CSP DAILY LEARNING · DAY 155

审计与管理评审 · 情景应用 | Audits & Management Review · Scenario in Action

第 30 块 · Domain 2 · 项目管理 · 25%Block 30 · Domain 2 · Program Management · 25%第 4 / 5 课 · 情景应用Lesson 4 of 5 · Scenario in Action

本课只做一件事：拿「审计与管理评审」做一次真实判断：按步骤走完，答案由推导得出而不是靠回忆。

Use Audits & Management Review in one real decision: follow the steps, derive the answer instead of recalling it.

本课不涉及：不新讲概念，也不做多题连练——只走一个场景。
Not covered here: No new concepts, no question drills — one scenario, walked through.

本课目标 | Learning objectives

  1. 按三步走完一个场景，并说出每一步的依据
  2. 区分「更有效」与「更先做」两类答案
  3. 把结论写回自己的术语表

  • Walk a scenario in three steps and justify each
  • Separate the more effective answer from the earlier step
  • Write the conclusion back into your glossary

    • 图片预览 / Photo preview

    图片经过压缩后保存在当前浏览器。导出失败时，可在下方预览图片上长按保存。/ The photo is compressed and stored in this browser. If download fails, long-press the preview below to save it.

    场景走一遍 | Walk the scenario

    内审抽查三个车间：A 车间记录齐全、演练按年做；B 车间许可单有两处漏签（全年 40 张中 2 张）；C 车间应急预案还是三年前的旧版、两年未演练、无培训记录。审核员在报告里把三项都写成「观察项」，建议「持续改进」。

    An audit samples three shops: A is clean with yearly drills; B has two unsigned permits out of 40 for the year; C still runs a three-year-old emergency plan, no drills for two years and no training records. The auditor grades all three as observations, 'continuous improvement advised'.

    1. 第一步：重审分级——A=无需发现；B=个别疏漏=轻微不符合（限期整改+原因说明）；C=程序过期+两年未演练+无培训=体系性失效=重大不符合 — Step 1 — regrade: A, nothing to add; B, isolated lapses = minor nonconformity with deadline and cause; C, expired plan plus two years without drills plus no training = systemic failure = major nonconformity
    2. 第二步：重大不符合的处理——C 车间：根因分析（为什么体系三年没运转：无责任人？无计划？管理层不知情？）→ 限期整改计划（新预案、当月演练、补训）→ 管理评审跟进资源需求Step 2: Handling major nonconformities — Workshop C: root-cause analysis (why did the system idle for three years: no owner? no plan? management unaware?) → a time-bound corrective action plan (new emergency plan, drill this month, backfill training) → management review follows up on resource needs — Step 2 — handle the major: root-cause analysis for C (why did the system idle three years — no owner, no plan, management unaware?), a deadline plan (new预案, drill this month, training backfilled), and management-review tracking of resources— Step 2 — handle the major: root-cause analysis for C (why did the system idle three years — no owner, no plan, management unaware?), a deadline plan (new contingency plan, drill this month, training backfilled), and management-review tracking of resources
    3. 结论与依据：结论=分级改为观察/轻微/重大三档，C 进 CAPA 与管理评审；依据=分级看体系性不看后果。制度修复：给审核员做分级校准培训（同一情形同一档） — Conclusion and basis: regrade to observation, minor, major; C enters CAPA and management review. The basis — grade by systemness, not consequence. System fix: run grader-calibration training so like cases grade alike

    走完这三步再往下答题；答案不是背出来的，是按步骤推出来的。/ Work the three steps before answering — the answer is derived, not recalled.

    情景自测 | Scenario check

    考点应用Exam-point application

    这道题考什么：考体系性失效的定级与处置。
    Tests grading and handling of systemic failure.

    内审发现某车间两年未做应急演练。应定级为什么并怎么处理？

    An audit finds a shop floor has run no drills for two years. Grade and action?

    自编练习题，不是 BCSP 官方真题，也不能用来预测分数。 / Original practice item, not an official BCSP exam question.

    动手练 | Practice

    1. 拿你们上次内审的三条发现，按「体系性」重新定级。
    Regrade your last audit's findings by systemness.

    学习打卡与笔记 | Progress & notes

    已完成 0/4 项 / 0/4 tasks complete

    连续学习 / Learning streak: 0 天 / 0 days

    进度保存在当前浏览器，不会自动跨设备同步。/ Progress is stored in this browser only.

    PNG 学习记录预览；可长按图片保存 / PNG card preview; long-press to save

    可靠来源 | Official references

    BCSP — CSP Examination Blueprint (CSP11)

    BCSP — Official Self-Assessments

    BCSP — Certified Safety Professional (CSP)

    Pearson VUE — CSP 考试预约 / Scheduling

    本课为一般性学习资料，不替代现场专业评估、法规要求或组织程序。/ Educational content only.

    ← 返回课程目录 / Back to catalog